Chatbot or Google — what's the difference?
The most common mix-up: an AI chatbot is not a search engine. Google searches the web and returns links to pages where you find the answer yourself. A chatbot like ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini generates an answer — based on texts it was trained on. It doesn't search the web in real time (unless it has a dedicated search tool enabled).
That sounds like a technical detail, but it has major practical consequences:
- Finds existing pages on the web
- Shows sources and links
- Always current — knows today's events
- Best for: News, prices, opening hours
- Output: A list of links
- Generates answers from training data
- Often gives no sources
- Has a knowledge cutoff date
- Best for: Explanations, writing, summaries
- Output: A formulated answer in dialogue
Stiftung Warentest puts it well: a search engine becomes an answer machine. (Source: Stiftung Warentest, October 2025)
Worth noting: Google itself launched its own AI mode in Germany in October 2025 — a chatbot built directly into search that delivers answers instead of links. The line between search engine and chatbot is increasingly blurred. (Source: Stiftung Warentest, October 2025)
How do I write a good prompt?
A prompt is what you type into the chatbot — the question, task or instruction it responds to. Many people write something vague and wonder why the results are poor. The good news: better prompting is not rocket science. Four simple principles make the biggest difference.
Before / After — what this looks like in practice
Why does AI sometimes make things up?
AI chatbots "hallucinate" — meaning they invent information and present it as fact with full confidence. This can be wrong dates, fabricated sources, non-existent court rulings or simply false statements. The term comes from research and describes the fact that the model isn't lying — it has no consciousness — but produces statistically plausible text that happens to be wrong.
A real example: in 2023, a US lawyer filed court briefs containing citations from non-existent rulings that ChatGPT had made up. The court imposed a sanction. (Source: New York Times, May 2023)
When is the risk particularly high?
- Very specific facts: Exact dates, statistics, legal paragraphs
- Current events: The AI knows nothing beyond its knowledge cutoff
- Source citations: Fabricated book titles, studies or links are more common than you'd think
- Niche knowledge: The more specialised the topic, the less reliable the output
A recent study found that about one third of AI chatbot responses on controversial current topics were incorrect — nearly double the rate from a year earlier. (Source: Stiftung Warentest, September 2025)
More on this — with figures and a model comparison — in the AI Assistants Comparison article.
Who's actually behind it all?
Chatbots appear everywhere today — on bank websites, in shops, in apps, in customer service. What many people don't realise: most of them are not independent AI systems, but wrappers around a handful of large models. The chatbot on your mobile provider's website almost certainly runs on GPT from OpenAI, Claude from Anthropic or Gemini from Google — just with a different look and restricted to specific topics.
This is called API integration: companies buy access to a ready-made model and build their own interface around it. The underlying model stays invisible. The four most important providers globally are:
- OpenAI (USA) — GPT models, behind ChatGPT
- Anthropic (USA) — Claude models
- Google DeepMind (USA) — Gemini models
- Meta (USA) — Llama models, open source
- Mistral AI (France) — European provider, partly open source
What this means for you: from a privacy standpoint, it matters which model is running in the background — not just which interface you see. If you share something personal with a chatbot on a website, that data goes to the actual model provider. More in the AI Assistants Comparison.
One subscription for all — bundling platforms like Mammouth
Anyone wanting to use multiple AI models faces a cost problem: ChatGPT Plus costs around €23 per month, Claude Pro around €18–20, Gemini Advanced around €22. Subscribe to all three and you're quickly paying over €60 a month.
An alternative is bundling platforms — services that don't develop their own AI model, but instead offer access to several major models through a single interface. The best-known example is Mammouth AI from France: from €10 per month, access to GPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek and more. (Source: mammouth.ai)
French platform, founded 2024. One subscription, many models. From €10 / month. (Pricing: mammouth.ai/pricing)
- Cheaper than individual subscriptions
- All major models in one interface
- Switch and compare models with one click
- GDPR-compliant, European provider
- No training on your data
- No native extras (no Artifacts, no custom GPTs)
- Only 50 premium messages per 3 hours
- No free trial available
- Trustpilot: 2.6 / 5 (as of March 2026)
AI chatbots are useful tools — but not oracles. Understanding how they work lets you use them sensibly: for drafts, explanations, ideas, summaries. Treating them like a search engine and accepting answers unchecked is a recipe for misinformation.
Particularly important: hallucinations are not a bug that can be optimised away — they are a property of the system. That doesn't make AI useless. It means critical thinking remains essential.
On privacy: what you tell a chatbot ends up with the provider of the model running in the background — not just the interface you see. For personal, health-related or legal matters: exercise caution.
Which model is best for what? Privacy compared? All key terms explained?